这句话中的定语与定语从句You are going to hear a personal opinion on why women are not given the same chances in their careers as men.我认为“on why women are not given the same chances in their careers as men”是定语,那"why women

这句话中的定语与定语从句You are going to hear a personal opinion on why women are not given the same chances in their careers as men.我认为“on why women are not given the same chances in their careers as men”是定语,那"why women
这句话中的定语与定语从句
You are going to hear a personal opinion on why women are not given the same chances in their careers as men.
我认为“on why women are not given the same chances in their careers as men”是定语,那"why women are not given the same chances in their careers as men"是什么从句呢?
“on why women are not given the same chances in their careers as men”是定语，可是"why women are not given the same chances in their careers as men" 又是个句子，可是又不能说它是个定语从句啊，因为有一个on在前面。
那究竟是定语还是定语从句啊，纠结！

这句话中的定语与定语从句You are going to hear a personal opinion on why women are not given the same chances in their careers as men.我认为“on why women are not given the same chances in their careers as men”是定语,那"why women
on why women are not given the same chances in their careers as men整个部分都是作定语修饰opinion,这个叫介词短语作后置定语.
举个例子,把后面那个从句替换一下：
You are going to hear a personal opinion on human rights.
human right在这里就是和介词on一起作opinion的后置定语,而human rights则是on的宾语.
所以同样的,why women are not given the same chances in their careers as men在这里就是on的宾语从句.
楼主的错误在于把所有起修饰作用成分中的从句都当成了定语从句,如果这个句子是定语从句,那么前提是on也是从句中的一部分,但明显不是,所以它并不是定语从句,而只是一个定语结构中的一部分.

on是介词 可以由about替换 意思是关于 why women are not given the same chances in their careers as men这个句子整个充当on的宾语 构成介宾 所以应该是宾语从句

为什么没人说这就不是从句？

我认为“on why women are not given the same chances in their careers as men”是定语，那"why women are not given the same chances in their careers as men"是做介词on的宾语，所以是个宾语从句。“on why women are not given the same c...

全部展开

我认为“on why women are not given the same chances in their careers as men”是定语，那"why women are not given the same chances in their careers as men"是做介词on的宾语，所以是个宾语从句。

收起